What Do the Bible Say About Gay?

Contents:

• “7 BIBLE QUOT SUPPORTG GAY RELATNSHIPS”
• BIBLE'S STANCE ON HOMOSEXUALY BIBLE SHOWS NO UNRSTANDG OF HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATN AS MUTUALLY SUPPORTIVE AND AFFIRMGALAN SHEARD, RETIRED NSULTANT PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICEAUTHOR RMATN COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE RMATN PMC DISCLAIMERWOODBECK DN22 OJJ GRO.DIA@NAEDTERCOPYRIGHT © 2000, BRISH MEDIL JOURNALEDOR—WAYTE QUOT SELECTIVELY OM THE NATNAL SURVEY ON SEXUALY ABOUT THE PREVALENCE OF HOMOSEXUALY.1 HE IS DOG EXACTLY WHAT I REPORTED MY PERSONAL VIEW—DISTORTG THE EVINCE.HE SAYS THAT THE “BIBLE REFERENC TO HOMOSEXUALY CLEARLY SHOW THAT THEY ARE DISAPPROVG OF HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVY (NOT ORIENTATN).”1 EXPERTS BIBLIL TERPRETATN BELIEVE THAT BIBLIL TIM THERE WAS NO UNRSTANDG OF THE MORN VIEW OF HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATN AS MUTUALLY SUPPORTIVE AND AFFIRMG.2,3 WAYTE IS RIGHT SAYG THAT THE BIBLE'S STANCE IS NOT TO “BASH HOMOSEXUALS.” LEVIC CHAPTER 20, VERSE 13 READS: “IF A MAN HAS TERURSE WH A MAN AS WH A WOMAN, BOTH M AN ABOMATN. THEY MT BE PUT TO ATH.” SO THE BIBLE'S STANCE IS NOT JT TO BASH HOMOSEXUALS BUT TO MURR THEM. WHY WAYTE OR ANYONE ELSE WANTS TO ASSOCIATE THEMSELV WH SUCH BARBARO AND HUMAN TEXTS IS BEYOND MY PREHENSN.WAYTE MENTS ON THE MEDIL RISKS OF HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVY BY WHICH HE PRUMABLY MEANS ANAL TERURSE. BUT ONLY TWO THIRDS OF GAY MEN TAKE PART ANAL TERURSE WHILE AS MANY AS ONE THIRD OF HETEROSEXUALS DO SO. THIS MEANS THAT MORE HETEROSEXUALS THAN HOMOSEXUALS HAVE ANAL TERURSE.4 WAYTE'S CRICISMS SHOULD THEREFORE BE PRIMARILY ADDRSED TO HETEROSEXUALS. AND THE NATNAL SURVEY FOUND THAT THERE IS NO GREAT DISPARY BETWEEN NUMBERS OF PARTNERS OVERALL.WAYTE SAYS THAT THE E OF THE WORD HOMOPHOBIA THIS NTEXT IS RRECT. A RECENT SURVEY OF 4000 KNOWN HOMOSEXUALS AND BISEXUALS HAS SHOWN THAT 34% OF GAY MEN AND 24% OF LBIANS HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSIL VLENCE AND 73% HAD BEEN TNTED THE PREV FIVE YEARS BEE OF THEIR SEXUALY.5 THIS IS CLEAR EVINCE OF THE “EXTREME ABNORMAL FEAR OR AVERSN TO” HOMOSEXUALY WHICH WAYTE RIGHTLY QUOT AS A RRECT (THOUGH UNGRAMMATIL) FN OF HOMOPHOBIA.REFERENC1. WAYTE C. BIBLE IS DISAPPROVG OF HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVY BUT NOT HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATN. BMJ. 1999;319:123. . (10 JULY.) [PMC EE ARTICLE] [PUBMED] [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]2. VASEY M. FRIENDS AND STRANGERS. LONDON: HODR AND STOUGHTON; 1995. [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]3. REISS M. HOMOSEXUALY AND SCHOOLS—A CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE. LONDON: NATNAL CHILDREN'S BURE; 1999. . (SEX TN FOM LECTURE 1 JULY.) [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]4. BELL R. ABC OF SEXUAL HEALTH: HOMOSEXUAL MEN AND WOMEN. BMJ. 1999;318:452–455. [PMC EE ARTICLE] [PUBMED] [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]5. HEALTH EDUTN AUTHORY. MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTN AND SEXUAL INTY. LONDON: HEA; 1998. [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]BMJ. 2000 FEB 19; 320(7233): 514. » SUMMARY OF RAPID RPONS 2000 FEB 19; 320(7233): 514. SUMMARY OF RAPID RPONS

“7 BIBLE QUOT SUPPORTG GAY RELATNSHIPS”

I hate to wre another blog post on any homosexual issu, but breaks my heart when I see thoands of people watchg and sharg ntent that furthers the misnceptn that God is alright wh homosexual relatnships.

” Bee of the obsceni, I will not lk to the vio, but I will give you the ndown of all “7 Bible Quot Supportg Gay Relatnships, ” acrdg to Arielle Srcella and Matthew V.

The term, “sexual immoraly” is a translatn of the Greek word, “porneia” which acrdg to the Strong’s fn clus “adultery, fornitn, homosexualy, lbianism, terurse wh animals, etc. Those of who teach that homosexualy is wrong are dog so bee we love people and we want them to be set ee om their bondage of s.

BIBLE'S STANCE ON HOMOSEXUALY BIBLE SHOWS NO UNRSTANDG OF HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATN AS MUTUALLY SUPPORTIVE AND AFFIRMGALAN SHEARD, RETIRED NSULTANT PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICEAUTHOR RMATN COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE RMATN PMC DISCLAIMERWOODBECK DN22 OJJ GRO.DIA@NAEDTERCOPYRIGHT © 2000, BRISH MEDIL JOURNALEDOR—WAYTE QUOT SELECTIVELY OM THE NATNAL SURVEY ON SEXUALY ABOUT THE PREVALENCE OF HOMOSEXUALY.1 HE IS DOG EXACTLY WHAT I REPORTED MY PERSONAL VIEW—DISTORTG THE EVINCE.HE SAYS THAT THE “BIBLE REFERENC TO HOMOSEXUALY CLEARLY SHOW THAT THEY ARE DISAPPROVG OF HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVY (NOT ORIENTATN).”1 EXPERTS BIBLIL TERPRETATN BELIEVE THAT BIBLIL TIM THERE WAS NO UNRSTANDG OF THE MORN VIEW OF HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATN AS MUTUALLY SUPPORTIVE AND AFFIRMG.2,3 WAYTE IS RIGHT SAYG THAT THE BIBLE'S STANCE IS NOT TO “BASH HOMOSEXUALS.” LEVIC CHAPTER 20, VERSE 13 READS: “IF A MAN HAS TERURSE WH A MAN AS WH A WOMAN, BOTH M AN ABOMATN. THEY MT BE PUT TO ATH.” SO THE BIBLE'S STANCE IS NOT JT TO BASH HOMOSEXUALS BUT TO MURR THEM. WHY WAYTE OR ANYONE ELSE WANTS TO ASSOCIATE THEMSELV WH SUCH BARBARO AND HUMAN TEXTS IS BEYOND MY PREHENSN.WAYTE MENTS ON THE MEDIL RISKS OF HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVY BY WHICH HE PRUMABLY MEANS ANAL TERURSE. BUT ONLY TWO THIRDS OF GAY MEN TAKE PART ANAL TERURSE WHILE AS MANY AS ONE THIRD OF HETEROSEXUALS DO SO. THIS MEANS THAT MORE HETEROSEXUALS THAN HOMOSEXUALS HAVE ANAL TERURSE.4 WAYTE'S CRICISMS SHOULD THEREFORE BE PRIMARILY ADDRSED TO HETEROSEXUALS. AND THE NATNAL SURVEY FOUND THAT THERE IS NO GREAT DISPARY BETWEEN NUMBERS OF PARTNERS OVERALL.WAYTE SAYS THAT THE E OF THE WORD HOMOPHOBIA THIS NTEXT IS RRECT. A RECENT SURVEY OF 4000 KNOWN HOMOSEXUALS AND BISEXUALS HAS SHOWN THAT 34% OF GAY MEN AND 24% OF LBIANS HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSIL VLENCE AND 73% HAD BEEN TNTED THE PREV FIVE YEARS BEE OF THEIR SEXUALY.5 THIS IS CLEAR EVINCE OF THE “EXTREME ABNORMAL FEAR OR AVERSN TO” HOMOSEXUALY WHICH WAYTE RIGHTLY QUOT AS A RRECT (THOUGH UNGRAMMATIL) FN OF HOMOPHOBIA.REFERENC1. WAYTE C. BIBLE IS DISAPPROVG OF HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVY BUT NOT HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATN. BMJ. 1999;319:123. . (10 JULY.) [PMC EE ARTICLE] [PUBMED] [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]2. VASEY M. FRIENDS AND STRANGERS. LONDON: HODR AND STOUGHTON; 1995. [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]3. REISS M. HOMOSEXUALY AND SCHOOLS—A CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE. LONDON: NATNAL CHILDREN'S BURE; 1999. . (SEX TN FOM LECTURE 1 JULY.) [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]4. BELL R. ABC OF SEXUAL HEALTH: HOMOSEXUAL MEN AND WOMEN. BMJ. 1999;318:452–455. [PMC EE ARTICLE] [PUBMED] [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]5. HEALTH EDUTN AUTHORY. MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTN AND SEXUAL INTY. LONDON: HEA; 1998. [GOOGLE SCHOLAR]BMJ. 2000 FEB 19; 320(7233): 514. » SUMMARY OF RAPID RPONS 2000 FEB 19; 320(7233): 514. SUMMARY OF RAPID RPONS

” And sce Srcella and V don’t believe homosexualy is nmned the ntext of a “lovg and mted relatnship, ” then they believe they n simply dismiss most ( not all) of God’s nmnatn of homosexualy.

If people are born wh a sexual orientatn, then why wouldn’t there have been people the biblil tim who were exclively homosexual? Although Levic 18:22 shows God nsired homosexualy an abomatn unr the Old Law, Christians are not unr the Old Law today. This is why I have no problem g Levic 18 to show that homosexualy was one of the abomatns of Sodom, but is not a passage I lean heavily upon to nvce people homosexualy is a s today.